IP Unit – Reflective Report

Introduction

As a starting point and in line with my positionality and professional practice as an artist designer, it is natural for me to take a visual arts pedagogic approach and explore and communicate the initial planning for my Reflective Report.

I therefore share my processes and intentions through the form of a drawn diagram as below (Fig.1) and as inspired by Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle (1988).

Fig.1 Gibbs Reflective Cycle: Planning the Reflective Report (Kelly Harrison, 10 July 2025)

Building on the thoughts and approaches from my previous Intervention Outline post, in this report I describe the further design and evolution of my sustainable intervention which will embed intersectional social justice themes into the context of my teaching practice and beyond.

The intervention is now in two parts as per diagrams below (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3):

Fig.2 Part 1 – Drawing for Design: Mapping Diversity (Kelly Harrison, 10 July 2025)

Part 1 – Drawing for Design: Mapping Diversity (Autumn 2025)

Building on my previous Drawing for Design Lab: Community Kitchen (Feb 2025), I will develop and implement this ‘local’ creative workshop for GMD students in the Autumn term.

Note: it is my intention that this activity will form the basis of my Action Research Project and that related documentation of Part 1 will provide live case study content for potential funding applications for Part 2.

Fig.3 Part 2 – UAL: Drawing Club (Kelly Harrison, 10 July 2025)

Part 2 – UAL: Drawing Club (Spring/Summer 2026)

Building on the previous successes of UAL: Drawing Club 2022-24 at LCC (as described in my previous Intervention Outline post), in collaboration with UAL colleague Trudi Esberger I will propose a series of 6 x creative workshops across the 6 x UAL colleges. All planning, confirmation of details, completing funding applications etc will commence at the start of the Autumn term.

Intention

In What’s the Use? On the Uses of Use (2019), Sara Ahmed discusses institutional learning spaces and their inclusive and/or exclusive nature.

Ahmed states:

‘Spaces are not blank; they are shaped by histories of inclusion and exclusion. When you enter a space, you might be asked to adjust to what has already been assembled.’

It is my intention to build inclusive creative spaces, which will have a positive impact and improve overall student experience in lieu of the large, diverse, multi-national student cohorts at LCC and across wider UAL colleges. I am committed to creating a greater sense of community which I describe in further detail below.

Academic practice

As Lecturer in Communication Design on BA(Hons) Graphic and Media Design at LCC, I welcome that by undertaking the PgCert, this in turn is creating the unique opportunity for me to reflect upon and clarify my positionality in this current role at UAL – as per recent positive discussions with my line manager (Summer PRC 2025).

The intervention relates to my academic practice in such that the creative activities link to directly to core aspects of the GMD1 curriculum that I am focussed on including:

  • Exploration of combined analogue and digital drawing/image-making processes
  • Visual documentation and note-taking
  • Observational and abstract mark making
  • Mapping and diagrammatic data visualisation
  • Sequential imaging and visual narrative development.

Context

The context for both parts 1 and 2 of intervention will be informed and in line with UAL Social Justice/EDI themes and related contextual criteria as below:

  • Celebrate diversity and raise inclusivity
  • Encourage multi-disciplinary collaboration
  • Build physical and conceptual ‘safe’ spaces
  • Create shared communities of practice
  • Enhance student/staff awareness of UAL EDI directives 

Inclusive learning

Through the intervention I will encourage students to address the importance of inclusion and inclusivity within graphic and media design, to ensure their design practice and outputs are accessible and relevant to wider audiences, while fostering a sense of belonging and understanding.

By considering diverse perspectives and a broader contextual understanding thereof, students can create increasingly positive and effective methods of visual communication to avoid exclusion and to thereby promote positive social impacts across UAL and beyond.   

Rationale

Shen and Sanders (2023) state:

‘Design students are increasingly adopting multiple identities including that of a thinker, facilitator, activist and observer through engagement and collaboration with others.’

As described in my previous Intervention Outline post, the intervention will be based upon core activities: drawing and mapping diversity – celebrating identity through visual exploration of the nine protected characteristics (Equality Act, 2010).

Looking beyond the essential creative visualising activities of the designer, students will learn to observe and identify the interrelationships between themselves and their wider environments and to record and communicate diverse information with an attitude of openness, empathy, kindness and compassion – and with the notion of ‘adopting multiple identities’ and as responsible designers of the future.

Reflection

On reflection, it was the previous success of UAL: Drawing Club in its’ former iteration, that inspired my thinking when deciding on the direction for my intervention.

As described previously, I care deeply about creativity and community and my intervention is grounded in my practice and experience as an artist designer and educator in graphic media design.  

As the intervention design evolves and now being a sum of two parts, I believe the value to local GMD students (Part 1) and wider UAL student communities (Part 2) will be increased.

Added value and relevance will be created as drawing and mapping diversity activities will form the basis of a sustainable series of teaching and learning sessions that:

  • Clearly align with inclusive principles
  • Celebrate difference
  • Embed social justice through process
  • Increase participation levels
  • Raise visibility of diverse groups

Feedback

To recap, UAL: Drawing Club workshops concluded in summer term 2023 due to changes in mine and my colleagues’ work patterns at LCC/UAL.

Since then and in conversation with numerous peers, colleagues and students I have recieved enquiries as to whether and when UAL: Drawing Club might be revitalised and expanded.

Plus in turn, I have also welcomed positive feedback following my recent workshops including: UAL Earth Week, GMD LAB and PgCert Microteach sessions.

In combination, this positive feedback inspired me to explore further opportunities for both ‘local’ GMD activities aligned closely to my creative and pedagogic practices (Fig. 2) – and continued ‘wider’ UAL workshops linked to the creation of extended UAL communities of practice in the future (Fig.3).  

Key decisions

Initial practical planning conversations with my colleague Trudi Esberger have informed key decisions around how to evolve UAL: Drawing Club. Formally based at LCC, TE now works at UAL School of Pre-degree Studies at Lime Grove.

UAL: Drawing Club was originally funded and held at LCC. It is our intention to expand this programme to become a ‘bigger and better’ version of itself, with potential for 6 x creative community building workshops to be held at all 6 x UAL colleges.

Key challenges

Key challenges and initial considerations are; funding, staffing and site logistics. Given the implications of current major structural shifts at UAL in terms of restructuring, staffing and funding – potential applications for future project funding and related activities will need to be approached in a sensitive and timely fashion.  

Potential risks

Potential risks as identified are that it may not be possible, for greater reasons beyond my control as mentioned above, that revitalising and expanding UAL: Drawing Club may not be possible.

With the immediate necessity to design an intervention for the IP Unit and consequently implement an intervention as part of my ARP, it was on this basis that I decided to design interventions parts 1 and 2.

Action

Part 1 – Drawing for Design: Mapping Diversity – I propose that this workshop will follow the format of GMD LABS series and will be offered locally to GMD students in Autumn 2025, forming the basis of my ARP.

In discussion with my LM and CL at the end of the summer break, I will plan the workshop accordingly and to fit into GMD timetables. In recent discussion with my LM (summer PRC) and encouraged as per their suggestion, I will be excited to discuss my ideas with GMD YR2 tutors to explore how this workshop might best support aspects of curriculum that they are responsible for. 

In the meantime, I will also continue to have discussions and work with my colleague TE to explore future development opportunities going forwards for Part 2 – UAL: Drawing Club.

On a practical level I am currently waiting to hear key announcements with regards to future UAL Teaching and Learning/EDI funding opportunities.

In recent discussion with my PgCert tutor, it was interesting to discuss potential alignment of my intervention activities with UAL’s narrative for a future iteration of the Teaching Excellence Framework in 2026/27.

I aim to maintain an awareness as the TEF roadmap evolves, with a view to exploring possible sustainable opportunities to share my intervention as a potential case study for TEF evidence gathering in the future.    

Evaluation

I am excited for the possibilities my intervention might mean for my personal academic practice. In recent discussion with my LM further independent authorship and delivery of co-curricula creative activities and potential iterative development thereof will lead to furthering my skillset in line with a possible future application to senior lecturer plus as above I am interested in a level of involvement with the wider planning and preparation for UAL TEF.    

I am keen to embed truly sustainable models within both parts of my intervention and it is my aim to better inform and communicate my accrued academic and professional knowledge and experience via my pedagogic practice.

A potential sustainable, circular model would be to train student facilitators e.g. UAL Arts Temps and/or alumni, to help run workshops going forwards. Exploring opportunities such as an annual UAL: Drawing Club showcase/pop-up exhibition or digital gallery will also be explored as potential outward-facing events to increase uptake and raise inclusivity and visibility.

In conclusion it is my aim that the intervention proposals for my ARP will celebrate and communicate UAL’s inclusive, diverse and distinctive approaches to creative education and its positive impacts on student experience and outcomes.

Thank you for reading.

Reference

Gibbs G. Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle, Learning by Doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods (1988) Oxford: Further Education Unit, Oxford Polytechnic 

Ahmed S. What’s the Use? On the uses of use (2019),Duke University Press

Shen Y. and Sanders E. Identity Discovery: Small Learning Interventions as Catalysts for Change in Design Education (2023):

https://tinyurl.com/4n4ywwkc

Alderson, A. Is Design Still Serious about Improving Diversity (2025)

https://tinyurl.com/4vb77bxv

UAL: Climate, Racial and Social Justice Principals (2022)

https://tinyurl.com/mtw3b8ex

UAL: Integrating Climate, Racial and Social Justice Principles into the Curriculum (2025)

https://tinyurl.com/54tkaxmx

UAL: Social Purpose Implementation Plan (2023)

https://tinyurl.com/53pby4rp

UAL: Teaching Excellence Framework, Interim Assessment and Roadmap (2025)

https://tinyurl.com/mr28b6td

UAL: Allan Atlee announced as Interim Pro Vice Chancellor, Education and Students (2025):

https://tinyurl.com/3z49kb3t

What is the Teaching Excellence Framework?

https://tinyurl.com/3x35m6pv

Results of the Teaching Excellence Framework, Times Higher Education (2023)

https://tinyurl.com/y5ss4jmn

UAL Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) at LCC

https://tinyurl.com/msdwjxb8

UAL Funding available for LCC Equality, Diversity and Inclusion initiatives and projects

https://tinyurl.com/3mc4xady

UAL Teaching and Learning Fund:

https://tinyurl.com/kt54xvau

LCC Teaching and Learning Innovation Fund:

https://tinyurl.com/kt54xvau

Identity Mind Map:

https://tinyurl.com/4pmuxdtc

Drawing Diversity:

https://tinyurl.com/ynncytdu

Changed Identity,Tate:

https://tinyurl.com/h8uwtzun

Identity Through Portraiture: The Self, National Portrait Gallery:

https://tinyurl.com/4zx7ardu

Expressing the Individual, National Gallery of Art:

https://tinyurl.com/mr3bnw64

Posted in IP | Leave a comment

IP Reflective Blog Post 3 – Race

Our community is diverse and complex. We value understanding its distinct characteristics so we can build a creative education environment that works for all our students”. UAL, EDI report (2024) 

In this final IP blog post I welcome the opportunity to develop a deeper understanding of approaches to addressing racism in my practice as an educator and artist designer, with a commitment to playing a role in dismantling systemic racism within our university and the creative industries, in line with the UAL Anti-Racism Strategy and newly updated UAL EDI report 2024.

Fig. 1 Race and Ethnicity: Exploring Keywords (Kelly Harrison, 25 June 2025)

I review resource: Race and Ethnicity (E. Blackmore/National Geographic) and in role as educator by way of introducing important key terms to students I share the diagram as above to visualise definitions of the key terms: race and ethnicity. While it is understood that these terms and related scenarios and contexts are complex, the diagram communicates the definitions by way of a simple introductory, foundational teaching tool.

As described in my Intervention Outline, I am exploring opportunities to embed EDI themes into proposed creative workshops as part of the Action Research Project 2025.

Reviewing resource: Diversity, Equity and Inclusion/TEDx talk, I am inspired as Asif Sadiq states:

“That very (EDI) training is biased, it’s built with stereotypes, it’s not always diverse or inclusive… we must readdress how we teach, how we get people to understand different things if we’re truly going to embed change”.

This leads me to think carefully and creatively on how to devise and deliver appropriate and effective EDI themed workshops for students going forwards. 

Fig.2 ‘The School That Tried To End Racism’ Channel 4 (2021)

Reviewing resource: The School That Tried To End Racism, I am saddened by the children’s responses to the harsh reality of the information and situation they are made privy to. The challenging nature of the ‘experiment’ is met (unsurprisingly) with problematic reviews (YouTube) and I am frustrated when I am unable to access and watch the full TV series as I hoped to gain a better overall understanding of the programme’s premise.

Fig 3. Tate Kids Think About Art and Race (Tate 2021)

Thinking further on the importance of early, formative educative experiences around race and ethnicity, led me to review resource: Tate Kids Think About Art and Race. Pupils explored exhibition Soul of a Nation: Art in the Age of Black Power and were invited to create artwork to explore themes around identity, race and ethnicity as below:

Fig 4. Tate Kids: Exploring Identity, Made in Tate Paint (2021)

On reflection, this highlights my belief in the importance of art and creativity as a means to express and explore ourselves as physical, cultural and spiritual beings and to encourage positive anti-racism messaging. As I progress my plans for the EDI themed workshops, with this will come a due responsibility to treat participating students with utmost sensitivity and care.

Fig 5: Race and Ethnicity: Exploring Identities (Kelly Harrison, 26 June 2025)

I review Rhianna Garrett’s paper Racism Shapes Careers (2024), HE/UK students from racial minorities share their racial, ethnic and intersectional identities – within the context of how these factors may influence their future academic career trajectories. The anonymised, pseudonym quotes are genuine and heartfelt and I intend to model a similar careful approach with my students going forwards. The overall aim of the EDI themed workshops being to use the original content (identities) for the creation of exploratory, visual drawing, mapping and diagrammatic designed outcomes.

In conclusion, through application of the learnings as described above, it is my aim to foster positive, pro-active approaches ongoing within my pedagogic practice and in line with the UAL Anti-Racism Strategy and UAL EDI report (2024).

Reference

UAL: Anti-Racism Action Plan (2021)

https://tinyurl.com/bderbf3e

UAL: EDI Data Report (2024)

https://tinyurl.com/bddu5776

UAL: EDI Annual Report (2024)

https://tinyurl.com/mte8fm9m

Blakemore, E. Race and Ethnicity: How are they different? (2019) https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/race-ethnicity

https://tinyurl.com/2yn4b5da

Sadiq, A. Diversity, Equity & Inclusion. Learning how to get it right.TEDx (2023)https://tinyurl.com/bdd59yep

Channel 4, The School That Tried to End Racism (2020): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1I3wJ7pJUjg 

Tate: Kids think about art and race (2021)

https://tinyurl.com/2yn4b5da

Tate Kids Gallery (2025)

https://tinyurl.com/9w8w84by

Garrett, R. Racism shapes careers: career trajectories and imagined futures of racialised minority PhDs in UK higher education (2024): https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2024.2307886

Pastan, A. Norman Rockwell and The Problem We All Live With (2025)

https://tinyurl.com/5brnhy2s

Adina, P.The artists fighting racism (2022)

https://tinyurl.com/29x97wj7

Posted in IP | 5 Comments

IP Intervention – Outline

Introduction

As both a practicing artist designer and educator I strive to integrate my professional expertise within my pedagogic practice. In addition to my core teaching duties at LCC, I devise and deliver creative workshops including:

  • UAL: Drawing Club (themes change weekly)
  • UAL: Earth Week (Elemental Animals and Mythical Creatures)
  • LCC/GMD: LAB (Drawing for Design)
  • LCC: Welcome Week (Community Kitchen)
  • LCC: Community Day (Community Portrait)

Through this intervention summary proposal, I will outline the development of an intervention which will build upon my existing areas of work to celebrate diversity, promote inclusivity and create community and co-learning opportunities among UAL students and staff.

Fig.1 Intervention Planning: Creative Workshop (Kelly Harrison 24/5/2025)

In response to the present challenges presented by rising costs of living and increasing student numbers from diverse backgrounds with wide-ranging needs, this intervention will align with my commitment to foster (Fig.1):

  • Creativity
  • Confidence
  • Connection
  • Collaboration
  • Community

Fig.2 UAL: Drawing Club 1 (Trudi Esberger and Kelly Harrison, 2023)

UAL: Drawing Club

Between Autumn 2022- Summer 2024, I co-ran UAL: Drawing Club weekly workshops at LCC with Trudi Esberger. The first iteration of DC was launched online by TE during Covid-19. When in-person teaching resumed and the cost-of-living crisis hit, KH and TE collaborated to launch DC as weekly in-person workshops every Tuesday at LCC from 6-8pm.

All drawing materials plus hot drinks and snacks were provided free of charge and a different drawing theme was offered each week. The sessions were open to all UAL students and staff, with an average session accommodating between 40-50 participants per week.

Fig.3 UAL: Drawing Club 2 (Trudi Esberger and Kelly Harrison 2023)

Note: TE and KH have had other work commitments this year and UAL: Drawing Club did not run during 2024/25.

Intervention Planning

In consultation with my colleagues, it is my aim to re-launch DC in Autumn 2025 and to allocate a number of bespoke designed workshops as live case study sessions upon which to scaffold my Action Research Project, having followed the correct procedures with regard to student permissions etc.

An initial sample idea for such an intervention workshop session could be:

Exploring and Drawing Diversity – celebrating identity through visual exploration of our nine protected characteristics (Equality Act, 2010)

Fig.4 Intervention Planning: Exploring and Drawing Diversity (Kelly Harrison, 24/5/2025)

I anticipate my immediate tasks to be:

  • Discuss re-launch of UAL: Drawing Club 2025 with GMD Programme Director
  • Explore timetabling options to best accommodate students e.g. new Y1
  • Plan weekly session activities, plus focus on bespoke ARP session requirements
  • Estimate costs for related materials and refreshments, agree budget
  • Action feedback from tutor and peers, in preparation for the reflective report

I look forward to future discussions with my peers and colleagues and to receiving feedback from my tutor – I’m excited about progressing these activities and developing new areas of my pedagogic practice.

Reference

Harrison K. UAL GMD LAB: Drawing for Design (2025) https://lab.gmdlcc.com/lab/drawing-for-design/

Esberger T. and Harrison K. UAL Drawing Club (2023) https://www.arts.ac.uk/students/stories/join-lccs-weekly-drawing-club

UAL Tell Us About It Archive https://archives.arts.ac.uk/CalmView/Record.aspx?src=Catalog&id=TU

Salamon S. Drawing Laboratory (2018) https://sparkjournal.arts.ac.uk/index.php/spark/article/view/99/182

Equality Act (2010) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents

Lamm E. L. Visualising Inclusiveness and Diversity (2020) https://www.evalotta.net/blog/2018/5/8/visualising-inclusiveness-and-diversion

Birdi S. Drawing Diversity (2021) https://collections.reading.ac.uk/art-collections/learn/artist-residencies/drawing-diversity/

Millington R. 10 Artists Promoting Diversity Through Portraiture (2020) https://tinyurl.com/mr2h8ypx

Posted in IP | Leave a comment

IP Reflective Blog Post 2 – Faith

In this second blog post I welcome the opportunity to further build on my knowledge of Kimberlé Crenshaw’s theory of intersectionality and explore how faith intersects with other identity factors.

With my positionality as a non-religious person, exploring the topic of faith within the context my teaching practice is inciteful. In the first instance and as a visual learner, I find it a useful exercise to check dictionary definitions and visualise keywords as below:

Fig.1 Exploring keywords: faith, religion and belief (Kelly Harrison, 18 May 2025)

I also share the diagram as below to visualise how intersectionality connects different identities via one lens, evidencing how experiences of multiple discrimination can arise, thereby highlighting the importance of avoiding a ‘one size fits all’ approach.

Fig. 2 How faith intersects with other identity factors (Kelly Harrison, 18 May 2025)

I was struck by Simran Jeet Singh’s relatable and emotive video ‘Challenging race, religion and stereotypes in the classroom’. His description and contextualisation of how the Western world was built around discrimination and racism, flagged up the importance of acknowledging historical events and raising awareness of how these negative behaviours still exist to this day.

By way of example, I was saddened by his description whereby he boards a plane and feels obliged to smile and talk about his daughters to reassure fellow passengers – illustrating how the intersection of faith with other identifying characteristics still has the potential to create negative assumptions and stereotypes.

I noted how Singh highlighted three key positive methods and approaches to address exclusion and marginalisation in his classrooms as below:    

Challenge stereotypes:

Singh states ‘One of the real challenges we’re facing in our society is a tendency to try and paint entire communities with a single brush stroke’. I am inspired by Singh’s painting metaphor as he describes how by raising awareness of our behaviours and creating opportunity to demonstrate and challenge stereotypes, we should be aiming to create increased inclusivity in the classroom.  

Engage with difference:

Singh states ‘Everyone has their own experiences, everyone has their own perspectives, and if we can try and understand where people are coming from with empathy, with sort of a human element then that allows us to really engage with difference in a way that is constructive rather than destructive’. Key words which resonate with me here are ‘empathy’ and ‘human element’, by raising levels of empathy and human understanding we should be aiming to not only engage with, but also celebrate our differences.

Deal with argumentation:

Singh describes how he encourages students to ‘Look at the ways in which people mobilize different arguments and propaganda as a way of gaining power’. He describes how raising student understanding and awareness of how the use of speech, media and debates are used (for good and bad), will help better equip them to understand what they are encountering in the world.

In reference to my own teaching context, I note that while numbers of UAL students who identify with a religion or faith has declined from 34% in 2019/20 and to 29% in 2022/23 (Fig.3). This data makes me question whether current global and political issues are impacting on students’ willingness to either engage with or share their faith, religion or belief identities?

Fig.3 Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Annual Report (UAL 2022/2023)  

As discussed in previous blogs, I teach large student groups and so it’s not possible for me to know everyone’s intersected identities. That said, the materials for this unit (in particular Singh’s methods and approaches as above), have enriched my knowledge which I aim to embed into my teaching practice to create opportunities for increased inclusivity and supported learning environments – for all students with diverse faith, religion and belief identities.


Reference

Singh, S. J. / Trinity University (2016) Challenging Race, Religion, and Stereotypes in the Classroom https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CAOKTo_DOk


TED (2014) Appiah, K. A. (2014) Is religion good or bad? (This is a trick question) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2et2KO8gcY


Reki, J. (2023) Religious Identity and Epistemic Injustice: An Intersectional Account


Jawad, H. (2022) Islam, Women and Sport: The Case of Visible Muslim Women.  https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/religionglobalsociety/2022/09/islam-women-and-sport-the-case-of-visible-muslim-women/ 

Dunn, R. and McKeown, P. (2021) ‘A ‘Life-Style Choice’ of a Philosophical Belief?: The Argument for Veganism and Vegetarianism to be a Protected Philosophical Belief and the Position in England and Wales’

UAL, London (2023) Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Annual Report 2022/2023  https://www.arts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/432141/SPCB23435-EDI-report-2022-23.pdf

Ramadan (2022) When faith intersects with gender- the challenges and successes in the experiences of Muslim women academics.pdf 

AHEA (2018) Religion_and_belief-Section_3-Student_inclusion-access_experience_and_learning_1579783006.pdf 

Posted in IP | 5 Comments

IP Reflective Blog Post 1 – Disability

I welcome the opportunity to increase my knowledge of Kimberlé Crenshaw’s theory of intersectionality and use it as a lens to gain a deeper understanding of how disability intersects with other identity factors.

Crenshaw states:

‘There are many, many different kinds of intersectional exclusions. Not just people of colour, but people with disabilities. Immigrants. LGBTQ people. Indigenous people. Intersectionality is an analytic sensibility, a way of thinking about identity and its relationship to power’.

As a lecturer in communication design and artist practitioner I instinctively gravitate towards visual (drawing) methods to aid understanding of theories, explore thoughts and develop concepts. This is an approach I embed in my teaching on BA (Hons) Graphic Media Design at LCC, and if I was introducing students to intersectionality I would typically set an introductory task e.g. draw your intersectionality. As an example, and in response to Crenshaw’s theory I share the drawn infographic image of my intersectionality as below (Fig.1):

Fig.1 Exploring intersectionality: me (Kelly Harrison, 29 April 2025)  

Paralympian basketball team player Ade Adepitan states:

‘What makes people disabled is not their disability, it’s society, society is what holds us back.’

Ade a disabled Nigerian-born man of colour, was selected for the Paralympic wheelchair basketball team in 2000. His sporting career led to further opportunities as the first disabled TV travel presenter and he remains a dedicated disability advocate. He cites how societal failure in the provision of fair and equal opportunities for all, and how systematic racial discrimination and oppression ‘holds us back’. He states that although overt racial discrimination has reduced since the 1980’s, disability still intersects with other identity factors such as race, skin colour, age and appearance – negatively impacting on fair and equal opportunities including travel, accommodation and employment.

Sound artist Christine Sun Kim states:

‘I want deaf lives to be in your mind and be part of what we consider acceptable’.

As a partially deaf female myself, Christine’s story as a deaf female sound artist resonates with me deeply. Her disability, her deafness, is a primary source of reference and intersects consistently with her artwork and her ‘deaf identity’. She cites examples whereby the intersection of her disability intersects negatively with her daily life including education, work, entertainment and family. Her multidisciplinary artwork makes use of drawings, infographics, paintings, videos, installations and performances to explore themes around deaf culture, sound, silence, ASL, musical and language visual interpretation. By way of evidencing how these intersections impact on Christine’s daily lived experience as she navigates the hearing and non-hearing worlds and the the art world as a deaf person – I share two examples of her artwork as below (Fig.2 and Fig.3):

Fig.2 Shit Hearing People Say To Me, charcoal and oil pastel (Christine Sun Kim, 2019)

Fig.3 Degrees of my deaf rage in the art world, charcoal and pastel (Christine Sun Kim, 2018)

To conclude and within the context of my own teaching experience, I note that UAL data (UAL EDI Annual Report and Active Dashboards) evidences that disabled students are achieving higher attainment levels than non-disabled students, however retention levels amongst disabled students are lower than non-disabled students. There is also a notably higher level of Home students with declared disabilities than EU and International students – it would be interesting and useful to learn why these differences exist. With this knowledge in mind, I therefore fully realise the importance of remaining considerate and aware of both visible and hidden disabilities at UAL, and to fully implement inclusive, accessible, supportive, and kind approaches at all times – within my pedagogic practice now and in the future.

Reference

Kimberlé Crenshaw: What is Intersectionality?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViDtnfQ9FHc.

Kimberlé Crenshaw On Intersectionality: The Big Idea: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BnAW4NyOak

Intersectionality 101: What is it and why is it important? https://www.womankind.org.uk/intersectionality-101-what-is-it-and-why-is-it-important/

Diversity and Inclusion Speaker’s Agency https://diversity-inclusion-speakers.com/news/top-10-lists/intersectionality-what-it-is-who-to-book/

Adepitan, A. and Webborn, N. (2020). Paralympics GB Legends: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnRjdol_j0c  

Sun, C. (2024). Friends and Strangers: https://youtu.be/2NpRaEDlLsI

Sun C. (2015) The Enchanting Music of Sign Language, TED Fellows Retreat https://www.ted.com/talks/christine_sun_kim_the_enchanting_music_of_sign_language?language=en

Sun C. How I Became An Artist https://www.artbasel.com/stories/how-i-became-an-artist–christine-sun-kim?lang=en

The Social Model of Disability at UAL

UAL, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Annual Report, 2022/24 https://www.arts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/432141/SPCB23435-EDI-report-2022-23.pdf

UAL, Attainment by Disability, Active Dashboard, 2020-2024 https://tinyurl.com/c7csupuv

UAL, Retention by Disability, Active Dashboard, 2021-2024 https://tinyurl.com/4vkm8k6r

Education – Disability Rights https://www.gov.uk/rights-disabled-person/education-rights

Posted in IP | 6 Comments

TPP Reflective Blog Post 4

On discovering the resource: Orr S. and Shreve A. (2017), Signature pedagogies in art and design, I am introduced to groupings of signature pedagogies and teaching strategies which are distinctive to, and shared widely across many art and design subjects.

The reading describes how the signature pedagogies and teaching strategies support students not only to learn about the discipline, but also how to think and behave like creative practitioners – thereby creating a bridge between university learning and professional practice.  

Key signature pedagogies include:

  • The studio
  • Pedagogies of ambiguity
  • The brief
  • Development work
  • Research
  • Dialogic exchange
  • Materiality

On reflection, the entries on the list of identified pedagogies are familiar and highly relevant to my teaching into Year 1 Graphic and Media Design at LCC.

I find it interesting and enlightening to read an identified, theoretical, pedagogical ‘toolkit’ for art and design education. It is helpful and somewhat reassuring in terms of shared teaching practice, to learn that these pedagogies are widely recognised and utilised.

I add that the term ‘toolkit’ is one I often use in my teaching, to emphasise to students the resources available to them while they engage with their learning and  in preparation for their entry into the creative industries as professionals.

Fig 1. Relief printing, exploring core design principles (Kelly Harrison, 8 Oct 2024)

In response to the reading, I share the image above (Fig.1) to evidence students experimenting with relief printing (materiality) by way of exploring core design principles (development work/research). While the students work in the print workshops, there is valuable discussion and feedback between the students, technical staff and myself as tutor (dialogic exchange/co-learning).

Fig.2 Visual note-taking, recording the built environment (Kelly Harrison, 27 Feb 2025)

I also share the image above (Fig.2) evidencing students undertaking a visual note-taking activity in the built environment (development work, visual research and materiality).

The creation of multiple physical, drawings, diagrams and rubbings offers the opportunity for a pop-up exhibition back in the studio, shared peer/tutor feedback discussion about the processes and methods used, plus potential applications of the work to further inform the project development and final outcomes (studio, dialogic exchange).

I add that the Two States project brief is largely self-authored, the project parameters e.g. combined processes and methods are pre-defined, but the final outcomes are open to interpretation by the students and are undefined (pedagogies of ambiguity).

I intend to continue to reflect on the content in this useful reading, and to apply the learnings to my teaching practice going forwards. The listed teaching strategies are also of particular interest; I have earmarked these as I intend to reference these in preparation for the PgCert Active Research Project later this year (2025).

Reference

Orr S. and Shreve A. (2017), Signature pedagogies in art and design

Posted in TPP | Leave a comment

TPP Reflective Blog Post 3

In preparation for PgCert Workshop 2, I read hooks b. (1995), Talking art as the spirit moves us, art on my mind: visual politics.

The reading introduces me to African/American cultural critic and feminist theorist bel hooks, and the works of artists from marginal groups including: Mende art, Romare Bearden and Pat Ward Williams.

The reading documents and reflects on the reception to the artists’ works from mainstream (white majority) audiences and the lack of critical writing on African/American art, at that time.

On reflection, hooks writing opens my eyes to and raises my awareness of unconscious bias, reminding me to foster higher levels of inclusivity to create positive impacts as follows :

  • Looking beyond first impressions or stereotypes
  • Being aware of cultural diversity: cultural, social, age, beliefs, values, ethnicity
  • Listening to and respecting all students
  • Creating responsive and flexible teaching and learning programmes  
  • Adopting empathetic and compassionate teaching and learning methods
  • Fostering a ‘community of belonging’ (hooks) in the studio environment, and beyond
  • Maintaining an up-to-date ethical sensibility

I aim to continue to develop my teaching practice by embedding the above actions to grow as an educator – and as a student.

Fig. 1 Community-building through drawing (Kelly Harrison, 11 Dec 2024)

To conclude and in response to my learnings about community of belonging, I link back to drawing as a key component within my creative and educative practice.

I share image Community-building through drawing (Fig.1), this was from a warm-up/ice-breaker activity from the PgCert Induction (11 Dec 2024), where we were asked to draw a quick observation portrait of our new peers by way of introduction.

I chose to use the drawing method where you draw using a continuous line without lifting the pen off the paper and not taking your eyes off your subject.

As per previous drawing from memory observations and learnings (described in Reflective Blog Post 2), this drawing activity embodied the connections made between the physical act of drawing and memory. A positive result of which, is I still recall both that moment in time and both of my peers names – and hence the PgCert 2025 community was created from then on.

Reference

hooks b. (1995), Talking art as the spirit moves us, art on my mind: visual politics

hooks b. (1994), Teaching to transgress, education as the practice of freedom

hooks b. and Powell J.A. (2015), Belonging through connection (othering and belonging conference): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sX7fqIU4gQ

Elcoro M. (2024), Introducing bell hooks to teachers of behaviour analysis: https://science.abainternational.org/2024/02/28/introducing-bell-hooks-to-teachers-of-behavior-analysis/

Currell J, (2022), Who is bell hooks and why should a teacher read her work? https://mathsnoproblem.com/blog/teaching-practice/bell-hooks-teacher-read-work

Posted in TPP | Leave a comment

TPP Reflective Blog Post 2

Fig.1 Drawing from memory, PgCert Workshop 1 (Kelly Harrison, 8 January 2025)

The resource I discovered, Salamon S. (2018), Drawing laboratory introduces and evaluates a series of 5 Drawing laboratory workshops devised at Central St Martins.

The workshops explore drawing as a visual research tool for creative thinking, improved concentration, and the connections between the physical act of drawing and memory.

The article resonates with me because drawing is a key component of my practice as an artist designer and I frequently embed drawing activities into my teaching and learning at UAL.

While my students develop their practice within an increasingly digital environment, drawing continues to be a relevant primary visual research and design thinking tool. The physical, material and cognitive process of drawing creates unique and original content.

I encourage students to explore, test and make combined use of analogue and digital processes in their work. These factors routinely generate interesting and inciteful discussions in the studio sessions, and result in creative mixed media processes and final project outcomes.

Salomon writes drawing as a concentrated activity could emphasize students’ ability to recall past experience, by developing enhanced connections between hand and eye they would find a greater level of connectivity between experience and information stored in memory.’

Inspired by Salomon’s exploration of the relationship between drawing process and memory, I applied this approach after PgCert Workshop 1 as follows:

At the start of the session and as a group introductory task, we were invited to choose a postcard each, and to use the postcard as an initial point of introduction and discussion with our new peers.

On reflection the task was successful because after the session, I realised via the visual associations of the images on the postcards and my peers’ descriptions, I was able to recall who-was-who.

After the session, and as a test to myself, I drew the 5 postcards from memory. As I drew I was able to remember not only the names of my new peers, but also why they had chosen each postcard (see Fig.1).

In conclusion, I will continue to explore, extend and apply these learnings to my teaching and learning. As an example I include a memory drawing task in workshop: Community Kitchen (Microteaching) as documented here and as part of my TPP portfolio submission.

Reference

Salamon S. (2018), Drawing laboratory

Posted in TPP | Leave a comment

TPP Case Study 3

Assessing Learning and Exchanging Feedback

Contextual Background 

Working with a co-tutor, two-part Formative Assessment Sessions take place in D110 at LCC with 31 students from Year 1 Graphic and Media Design BA (Hons). The session is to be repeated 2 times in rotation, to accommodate the large Year 1 cohort (160 students in total).

The sessions are designed to support project completion after the tutor-led studio delivery phase, helping students identify what is to be developed further in their independent study time, prior to final project submission.

Using Observation, Suggestion, Task as a prompt, students undertake:

Formative Assessment Presentation: formal presentations, students stand up in front of the group and present their work-in-progress via Padlet on the large studio screens (5 min). Students receive Tutor Observations and Suggestions (and Tasks if necessary).

Evaluation 

Fig.1 TPP Case Study 3, Studio Architecture (Kelly Harrison, 24 Jan 2025) 

As seen above left (Fig.1), students are standing in rows at the front of the studio facing the large screen, tutors are standing to the right and the student presenting stands to the left of the screen.

I note that within the formal, structured setting of the Formative Assessment Presentations, some students appear to find the setting (the physical studio environment) challenging; being visibly uncomfortable and nervous, at times finding it difficult to speak audibly to the tutors and student group.

As some students are unable to clearly communicate their learning and project development in this setting, there is an evident barrier for tutors to gain sufficient understanding, to provide comprehensive, in-depth feedback as part of effective Formative Assessment Processes.

I am interested to read:

The public nature of many critiques can be problematic, creating a climate of ‘fear, defensiveness, and anxiety’ especially given the harsh form they routinely take in certain disciplines.’ (Mcdonald and Michela 2019)

This acknowledgement that the crit/formative assessment process can be problematic for some students, supports my observations and decision to devise an active strategy and positive intervention to help develop and improve the overall student experience, and the quality of teaching and learning going forwards within this setting.

Moving forwards 

I am interested to read:

Formative assessment is designed to improve the teaching/learning process. It is a part of this process and provides feedback to both teachers and learners so that the programme can be adjusted to improve learning outcomes.’ (Dimensions of assessment, Anon)

The viewpoint that formative assessment is a two-way process informing both teachers and students, resonates with me and on reflection increases my overall confidence in supporting my decision to take positive action as I adjust the session to improve learning outcomes as detailed below:

Note: in addition to my tutor role at LCC, I work as Ceremonies Registrar in my local community in East Sussex. I conduct wedding and civil service ceremonies and I repurpose this professional skillset to my teaching context; I have the ability to ‘read a room’, understand peoples’ behaviour and body language and recognise signs of anxiety and stress. In my view, these transferable skills help me devise and implement appropriate strategies that have positive impacts on my teaching practice. 

I have a keen interest in the studio as a designed, physical space and resulting impacts on teaching and learning and hence the following statement resonates in this instance:

Individual sensory experiences of space affect everyone working in them and may potentially affect learning within the studio, depending on local conditions and their impact on individuals…the specific space of the studio may also impact on and influence the learning process and the actual artefacts which emerge from the studio.’ (Orr and Shreve, 2017)

Referencing empathetic and compassionate teaching methods (De Silva and Dempsey, 2022) I identify and understand that formal presentations can be daunting for students, and so I revise the ‘studio architecture’ or the physical setting of the session as seen above right Fig.1 and as follows:

What I do

  • Divide the group into smaller groups
  • Students seated in a horseshoe configuration
  • Encourage students to be brave, take ownership of their learning and feel empowered
  • Reassure students public speaking becomes easier with practice
  • Highlight that this is a supported ‘safe’ space and students should work collaboratively to support each other as they present
  • Ensure each student presents standing up, so their voice is audible
  • Tutors seated to the side of the screen, at an angle
  • Reposition the screen in the corner of the studio, at an angle
  • Provide regular praise and encouragement after each presentation

Why I do it

The revised setting is less formal and daunting; the audience is smaller, the configuration of students and tutors creates improved group cohesion, making students of all abilities and backgrounds feel comfortable and supported – raising inclusivity and creating the opportunity for co-teaching and co-learning.

It is understood that students need to develop and improve their presentation and public speaking skills as part of their educative and future professional practice.

The revised studio setting creates a ‘safe space’ where students can practice their presentation skills, develop their confidence and learn to present and their work effectively and professionally while feeling supported by their peers and tutors,

I my view these positive, active interventions evidence that as part of my PgCert learning journey I am becoming more aware of a range of teaching and learning methods and theories – which I apply to my practice. As my knowledge is growing, I am able to take control of the teaching and learning environment e.g. by revising session plans as needed – to improve the student learning experience and develop my current and future wider pedagogic practice.

Reference 

De Silva, D. and Dempsey, E. (2022), Empathy and compassion: towards wellbeing in learning development

Anon, Dimensions of assessment

Mcdonald, J.K. and Michela, E. (2019), The design critique and the moral goods of studio pedagogy

Orr, S. and Shreve, A. (2017), Signature pedagogies in art and design

Posted in TPP | Leave a comment

TPP Record of Observation of Teaching 3

Date: Tue 4 March 2025

Time: 10am – 11am

Session to be observed: Academic Support Workshop – ‘Reflective Writing’

Size of student group: MA User Experience Design – 25/30 students (usual attendance 5/6 students)

Observer: Kelly Harrison

Observee: Gem Smith

Note: This record is solely for exchanging developmental feedback between colleagues. Its reflective aspect informs PgCert and Fellowship assessment, but it is not an official evaluation of teaching and is not intended for other internal or legal applications such as probation or disciplinary action.

Part One
Observee to complete in brief and send to observer prior to the observation or review:

What is the context of this session/artefact within the curriculum?

This is an embedded workshop delivery from the academic support department. The session is a 2-hour workshop. All workshops are requested by the course team and scheduled accordingly. I have regular meetings with the course team to deliver a bespoke workshop according to the students brief.  The students are currently working on Macro User Experience and a Collaborative unit simultaneously.  They have a submission due in March.  This session is a follow up from other workshops that I have delivered to the students. They have had delivered so far critical writing, reading, thinking, making the grade, citation and referencing. I have access to the assignment brief and the workshop aligns with the requirements. The intention for this workshop is to provide a space where students can refine their knowledge of reflective writing and to take part in practical exercises to put this into practice. Students often ask for structures as a guide that they can customize to suit their style of writing. This is also an opportunity to signpost students to any further support from academic support and other services.

How long have you been working with this group and in what capacity?

I have been working with this group since September 2024. I am the assigned academic support for this course, this is my third year working with this course. I see a few of the students in this cohort for one-to-one tutorials as well.  The discussions in the workshop will also extend to individual tutorials.

What are the intended or expected learning outcomes?

  • For students to understand the definition of reflective writing.
  • For students to obtain practical tools and strategies to support their reflective writing with their Macro UX and Collaborative units.
  • For students to review and discover how to structure a reflective essay/report confidently.
  • To create a space for dialogue and discussion about reflective writing.

What are the anticipated outputs (anything students will make/do)?

  • Activity 1: Students will be asked how they feel about reflective writing and will be shown images as prompts. This will be an open question where feedback from students will take place.
  • Activity 2: Objects of reflection – Students will be given an object for each group.  Students will be asked to discuss and reflect on these objects using the What? So what? And Now what? Theory. Students will have 5 mins to discuss and 5 minutes to feedback. They will be given prompt questions to support them if needed.
  • Activity 3: ‘Observing Yourself’. This activity will be where students will be reflecting on their own achievements and any areas of improvements.  They will be working in pairs.  Students will be encouraged to make notes and discuss ideas with their partner and will later feedback
  • Activity 4: ‘Challenges with reflecting writing’.  Students will write on post it notes any challenge they face with reflective writing.  They will stick this on the table, and they will swop tables with another group. Students will then read out the post it notes and offer advice and support.
  • Activity 5: Students will review a good reflective example of writing considering the three stages of reflective writing. They can work in groups to complete this task. Students will feedback and review the piece of work together.

Are there potential difficulties or specific areas of concern?

  • One area of concern is regarding student attendance. The session is timetabled, and the students were reminded, however students’ attendance is often low from a class of about 20/25 students, attendance is generally about 5/6. This session is also not compulsory.
  • For some students English is not their first language, I must make sure that instructions are clear and that there are a variety of feedback methods.
  • The classroom is sometimes cluttered due to the student’s well needed experimentation and constructions. An early presence in the classroom is often advised so I can reconfigure the space where possible.

How will students be informed of the observation/review?

I have informed the course team, and they will notify the students beforehand.  I will also inform the students of the observer’s attendance in the session and assure them that they will be observing my teaching only.

What would you particularly like feedback on?

General feedback overall would be appreciated.

How will feedback be exchanged?

The use of this form will be the main source of feedback.

Part Two

Observer to note down observations, suggestions and questions:

The observation took place in D211 at LCC for 3 students.

The observee highlighted in advance of the session that attendance was sometimes a challenge, in part because the sessions are not compulsory.

Despite the small group size for this session, the students appeared to be content and confident, willingly offering answers to questions and contributing freely to group discussions.

Overall, there was a high level of engagement during the session and students engaged positively with each of the activities.

A QR code register was used which clearly worked well, this is something I will suggest we consider using in the GMD sessions – particularly as we have such large student numbers.

The observee informed the students that I was present in the room to view their teaching practice only and to ensure they felt comfortable and weren’t distracted by my presence.

When 1 student arrived 10 minutes late it was good practice to see the observee warmly welcome them, then clearly explaining the activity so they were able to catch up quickly and feel included in the session.

The observee spoke clearly and calmly creating a supportive and inclusive atmosphere. During the session students were seated and the observee was standing. Following the slide presentation, it was good practice to see the observee moving around the room and addressing the students individually and collectively, encouraging positive input and dialogue and working alongside them (co-working).

The observee presented open and positive body language, there was friendly exchange and some shared laughter in the session, evidencing the students felt comfortable while still maintaining an appropriate level of focus and active learning.

The session was introduced and delivered clearly via a PowerPoint and the overall structure of the session was well communicated.

The introductory warm-up task used animal images for students to explore and articulate how they feel about reflective writing. This was a relatable and fun way of inviting students to self-reflect and also for the observee to gain an initial understanding of the levels of academic support students might need at this stage.

The session clearly communicated the relevance of reflective writingto the Macro UX brief and Collaborative Unit. Students were introduced to and equipped with the appropriate tools, reflective models and structures to help support them writing their reflective essays and reports.

The Objects of Reflection (Object-based Learning) task was an effective starting point for introducing and exploring Reflective Models. Students engaged positively with the product analysis activity What Can You See? So What? and Now What?

As a suggestion, inviting students to draw the object and add annotations in response to a list of key product analysis prompts as guides could be useful in guiding and facilitating further in-depth knowledge and wider contextual reflection perhaps e.g. materials/manufacture, form/function, target audience/user group, date of design/designer, cultural/social issues, cost high/low value, environmental considerations and future design developments.

The Gibbs Reflective Model was an effective way to introduce and structure self reflection and to pave the way for the Reflection Activity: Observing Yourself. It was to the observees credit, that the students felt supported and comfortable enough to freely and honestly discuss achievements and successes with the group.

The observee responded positively to student questions throughout the session, clearly explaining key words, methods and approaches e.g. carefully explaining the difference between success and achievement.     

Overall, this was a very well devised and delivered session covering a wide range of methods and apppoaches to support students in their academic understanding and application of Reflective Writing skills for their UX design studies and practice.

A final note, the use of the timer was a good practical inclusion, I will embed this into my sessions too.

Part Three

Observee to reflect on the observer’s comments and describe how they will act on the feedback exchanged:

Thank you, Kelly, for observing my lesson.  It was a pleasure to have you in the session.

Thank you for your helpful and valuable comments, it is really appreciated.

It is very often a challenge within academic support where attendance is compromised.  This is a shame for this course for I have a strong working relationship with the course team, and we meet regularly to plan the workshops.  The lecturer communicates regularly with students to discover the areas of support that they need.  Very often students will request certain topics, and I will deliver this for them. The lecturer is very attentive to their students. The idea of being creative in terms of when the sessions are delivered needs further development, however we are posed with the idea of timetable restraints. This is an area for further development. Timing of the sessions is key.

It was good that the students that were present were able to express any challenges that they were facing, and they received some useful tools that they can implement in their work.

It is a known theme that the students that attend the workshops are the students who are doing well already and are proactive. They also book regular one to one tutorial. The challenge is to connect with all students.

That is a great suggestion to invite students to draw as well as to scribe and discuss the objects that they chose and to add annotations in response to a list of key product analysis prompts. This is another good way of offering support to students, this will also generate more in depth creative ideas and outcomes. Connecting their ideas to a wider context is good. As suggested students can look at what materials, target market, cost. cultural and environmental developments can be explored.  This will open a deeper gateway of reflection.  I will implement this in my reflective delivery in the future. Thank you for this, this makes total sense.  It is valuable having someone else viewing your lesson with a different lens.

Thank you again for your encouraging comments and suggestions, this has been very helpful. It has been a good experience sharing practice.

Posted in TPP | Leave a comment